YouTube/Vladimir Tatarenko
Ukrainian inventor Vladimir Tatarenko has come up with a concept for a plane with a cabin that can eject itself in the event of an aviation emergency. Some experts questions whether it's viable.
Courtesy of the German Aerospace Center (DLR)
SART researchers at the Institute of Space Systems in Bremen, Germany, unveiled their SpaceLiner concept last year. This hypersonic jet could potentially travel from London to Melbourne in 90 minutes.
Ray Mattison/Courtesy Charles Bombardier
The Skreemr concept design sparked debate in 2015. Its designers claim that it could travel at speeds as fast as Mach 10, reaching New York from London in 30 minutes.
MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images
Last year, a team from Bristol University in England developed technology that could repair cracks on an aircraft in a similar way that human skin heals. The researchers say it could be introduced in five to ten years.
Courtesy Errikos Levis/Imperial College London
Also in 2015, Errikos Levis of Imperial London College designed a concept for a family of transatlantic seaplanes that could carry up to 2,000 passengers. The plane would feature a blended wing body, and the engine would live on top of the plane.
Oscar Vinals
In 2015, designer and aviation enthusiast Oscar Vinals designed a triple-decker concept plane called the AWWA Progress Eagle, which he imagined carrying up to 800 passengers and running on solar power and hydrogen.
Alejandro Erickson/Oscar Viñal
Vinals designed the Skywhale in 2014. The imagined aircraft came equipped with self-repairing wings, large windows, a vertical takeoff ability and room for 755 passengers.
Courtesy Hybrid Air Vehicles
In 2014 British design company Hybrid Air Vehicles brought airships back in fashion with a design for the Airlander 10, a 92-meter-long airship filled with helium.
Courtesy Airbus
Aircraft manufacturer Airbus has floated the idea of a futuristic plane with a transparent cabin, holographic pop-up gaming displays and seats that change in size and shape to fit each passenger. They've hinted that such a plane could be in the skies by 2050.
Spike Aerospace
In 2014, Spike Aerospace announced plans for what the world's first supersonic business jet, one capable of breaking the sound barrier, and traveling at Mach 1.8. The S-512 supersonic jet would have no windows (to decrease drag). Instead, the cabin would be lined with screens that could display the landscape outside.
CNN  — 

Hydrogen-powered planes, self-healing planes, planes that fly at Mach 10 or are powered by body heat … The world of planes that don’t exist but could (and have fancy renderings to prove it) is rich indeed.

Now, Ukrainian inventor Vladimir Tatarenko has added a new concept plane to the pile: This one has a cabin that detaches from the cockpit when the flight goes belly-up.

The idea is that in the event of an emergency, the pilots could push a button that would allow the cabin – complete with passengers and cargo – to separate from the rest of the plane and float down to safety with the help of attached parachutes.

The pilots themselves, it seems, are out of luck.

What if the cabin lands on water, you ask? Inflatable tubes would be at the ready to keep it afloat.

According to a YouTube video Tatarenko released last month, he is looking for investors for this new project.

Before you break out your wallet, there are some in the aviation community that find the concept more than a little farfetched.

YouTube/Vladimir Tatarenko

For starters, the cost of building and testing this new aircraft would be, undoubtedly, extravagant.

Airlines already spend between $100 million and $350 million per aircraft as is – and that’s without the yearly maintenance costs.

They would have little motivation to replace a trustworthy fleet with an untested concept, especially as plane crash fatalities are exceedingly rare.

According to airline association IATA, in 2014 (a tragic year for air flight), out of the 3.3 billion passengers that traveled, there were a total 641 fatalities.

This is actually an astoundingly high safety rate. Perhaps the money would be better spent addressing heart disease, which is responsible for over 610,000 deaths yearly in the U.S. alone?

Where will it land?

Economics aside, the mechanics seem, well, a bit dubious. As one commenter on Tatarenko’s YouTube page points out:

“This whole concept dramatically weakens the airframe because now you have joints and fittings to connect a fuselage and a body together where once you had a whole fuselage to reinforce the airframe.”

Also, what if the ejected cabin doesn’t land – as depicted in the video – on a conveniently flat piece of land? What if it hits mountains, or buildings?

Without pilots (or, indeed, wings) to direct it, who’s to say where it would land?

MORE: Really? ANOTHER cool proposal for a supersonic airliner?