2:57 p.m. ET, July 9, 2020
SCOTUS ruling on New York prosecutor's subpoena set to reignite investigation into Trump
From CNN's Ariane de Vogue, Devan Cole and Erica Orden
The Supreme Court's decision today in the case about the New York subpoena promises to reignite a criminal investigation by the Manhattan district attorney's office that started more than a year ago.
How SCOTUS ruled: The court ruled that President Trump is not immune from a subpoena for his financial documents from a New York prosecutor — but prosecutors will not get the records for now. The cases were sent back to lower courts for further review.
Latest on the investigation: Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance's office has been examining whether Trump or the Trump Organization violated state laws in connection with hush money payments made to women alleging affairs with Trump.
The investigation has also looked into whether business records filed with the state were falsified and if any tax laws were violated, CNN has reported.
What comes next: On Thursday, Vance's office said its investigation had been delayed for nearly a year by Trump's lawsuit seeking to block grand jury access to his financial records, and said it would now resume, "guided as always by the grand jury's solemn obligation to follow the law and the facts, wherever they may lead."
Though the district attorney's investigation was hampered by lack of access to Trump's financial records, it has advanced in other ways in recent months.
Investigators have interviewed former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen as well as David Pecker, a longtime Trump confidante and the CEO of National Enquirer publisher American Media Inc., which admitted in federal court to having made payments during the 2016 election cycle to quiet a woman who alleged an affair with Trump.