12:26 p.m. ET, March 24, 2023
Bullard: SVB was a 'quirky bank that had a special problem'
From CNN's Alicia Wallace
Custumers lined up outside of the Silicon Valley Bank headquarters in Santa Clara, California, on March 13.
(Brittany Hosea-Small/Reuters)
The recent string of bank collapses are more likely one-offs than "harbingers of poor US macroeconomic performance," St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said Friday.
"It's true that when you raise rates, you're talking about affecting all these financial entities and all these different corners of the financial markets," he said. "Not every single one of them is going to adjust appropriately to the higher rate environment."
Bullard cited a handful of examples from recent history, including: in 1984, when Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company became the largest ever bank failure in US history; the Mexican peso devaluation in 1994; and the demise of the Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund in 1998.
Silicon Valley Bank, which took on billions of dollars of deposits from the cash-flush tech industry during the pandemic, is very likely another "unusual case" versus a sign of broader macroeconomic weakening, he said.
"If you're in a forest and then you come to a place on the road and there's a stop sign, and you're not sure if you're supposed to take a right turn at the stop sign or if you're supposed to go straight; you don’t want to split the difference and drive into the forest," he said. "You've got to make a decision about which way you're going to go."
And Bullard's decision hinged on what he viewed as his greatest probability scenario:
"The most likely case is that this is a quirky bank that had a special problem and we have taken actions to mitigate this and probably financial stress will abate," he said. "If it doesn't, I will have taken a wrong turn, but I think that's a lower probability here."