Washington(CNN) There wasn't much Ruth Bader Ginsburg needed to add on Monday to a landmark opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer that struck down a Texas law that would have closed all but nine abortion clinics in the state.
So she threw in some French.
"When a state severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners, faute de mieux, at great risk to their health and safety," she wrote in a brief concurring opinion.
Excusez-moi?
"Faute de mieux" is roughly translated as "for lack of a better alternative." Ginsburg was emphasizing that the so-called clinic shutdown law might force women without the means to resort to unsafe illegal clinics to perform their abortions.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion law
After the release of the opinion, Merriam-Webster said look-ups for the French phrase "spiked 495,000%" on its website.
Helpfully, Mirriam-Webster added that the phrase "has been in English use since at least 1766, often employed by those who seek to provide a Gallic flair to their writing."
Pronunciation? Foht-duh-MYUH.
Supreme Court issues in 2016
Texas abortion law: Amy Hagstrom Miller, founder and CEO of Whole Woman's Health, gestures to the crowd as she and Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, walk down the steps of the Supreme Court in March. They challenged parts of a Texas law --
struck down by the Supreme Court in June -- that required doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. The law also mandated that clinics upgrade their facilities to hospital-like standards. Supporters of the law argued that it was meant to protect women's health, but opponents said it was instead a disguised attempt to end abortion and that women would find it harder to end a pregnancy legally.
Obama's immigration actions: Demonstrators gather for a pro-immigration rally outside the Supreme Court in January. In June,
the court was deadlocked on executive actions President Barack Obama imposed two years ago on immigration.
The actions, blocked from going forward in February 2015, were meant to enable millions of eligible undocumented immigrants to receive temporary relief from the threat of deportation. The immigrants would also be allowed to apply for programs that could qualify them for work authorization and associated benefits. June's ruling means that the programs will remain blocked and the issue will return to the lower court.
Obamacare contraception mandate: Catholic nuns from the Little Sisters of the Poor walk down the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court in March. The group was challenging the government's new health-care regulations. Lawyers for the nuns and other religious nonprofits told the court that the so-called contraceptive mandate forces these groups to either violate their religious beliefs or pay ruinous fines. The justices, in a unanimous decision in May,
sent the case back down to the lower courts for opposing parties to work out a compromise.
Affirmative action: Abigail Fisher, a Texas woman who challenged the use of race in college admissions, speaks to reporters outside the Supreme Court in December. That month, Supreme Court justices
appeared divided about a program at the University of Texas that takes race into consideration as one factor of admissions. In June, the court
upheld the program in a 4-3 ruling. Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the case, presumably because she dealt with it in her previous job as solicitor general.
Public-sector unions: Rebecca Friedrichs, lead plaintiff in the case Friedrichs v. the California Teachers Association, walks with lead counsel Michael Carvin after the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing arguments on the case in January. The ruling in March
was split 4-4, so the lower-court decision was affirmed in a victory for public-sector unions. At issue was whether non-members of a public-sector union could still be compelled to pay fees for collective bargaining that goes to issues such as wages and grievances.
Scalia's replacement: Obama joins his Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, in the Rose Garden of the White House in March. But Republicans
have vowed to block any replacement for Antonin Scalia until a new President takes office.
But les mots justes aside, Ginsburg was hammering home a point she has made before. Two decades after Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 decision that re-affirmed Roe v. Wade, the women who will be most impacted by laws restricting abortions are the poor.
How Ruth Bader Ginsburg steered the court on Texas' abortion law
At oral arguments, Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller stressed that the majority of women in the state would live within 150 miles of a clinic. But that wasn't good enough for Ginsburg.
"We know from Casey that the focus must be on the ones who are burdened," she said. "This is not a problem for women who have means to travel ... those women will have access to abortion."
Ginsburg wrote separately, with flair, to make sure that point wouldn't be lost.